In the corporate sphere , there are cases of unethical behavior that are overlooked, and then there are stories that question the values of an organization . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, epitomizes such a situation— a chronicle of dubious professional actions that significantly damages the reputation of a single manager but throws doubt over the company’s principles .
In spite of numerous complaints, Collins has stayed unscathed, appearing untouched by the turmoil engulfing him. How has this been tolerated? What does this say about the company’s commitment to responsibility ? From what insiders reveal , Collins’ history of inappropriate actions was initiated by breaking of the company’s code of conduct , but it didn’t conclude at that point . Instead, it intensified into a chain of concerning actions that has left fellow employees demoralized and partners bewildered .
Throughout a leadership improvement workshop— intended to foster better management—David Collins allegedly turned what should have been a development chance into a chain of irresponsible incidents . Sources claim he spent organization-paid excursions attempting to seduce female colleagues , a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s corporate ethics , all while his home life was kept in the dark.
But the impropriety didn’t conclude with these encounters . One of the gravest disclosures involves his alleged misuse of company IT systems to distribute inappropriate images to women—a gross misappropriation of professional tools and a breach of trust . His bold misuse of Microsoft Teams to send suggestive messages —including icons to boast about infidelities — creates a portrait of a man unconcerned with the consequences . Following these digital advances , Collins allegedly progressed his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in sexual interactions with an employee on multiple occasions during company hours , despite his own marital status and her having a spouse . This transparent exploitation of company time and resources not only violated professional boundaries but led to familial breakdowns — leaving a path of mistrust that extended far beyond the office .
Why can this behavior be allowed to persist ? Why Ventia Kerikeri is it that a manager who has allegedly breached every guideline is still employed at Ventia? The explanation , it appears, is rooted in a worrisome failure of governance within the company . Grievances have been filed , yet Collins operates without restraint .
This lack of consequence conveys a risky precedent : that title and position within the organization can guard against punishment . It promotes a hostile office atmosphere , disheartens staff , and ultimately compromises the organization’s integrity .